A general chat assistant will summarise a contract. OneClause constrains the review: findings must cite the clause text they came from, proposed changes to your standards require explicit confirmation, and the system is instructed to say when something is not in the document rather than fill the gap.
Findings are grounded in extracted clause text and carry verbatim citations back to the source
Nothing changes your saved risk preferences without an explicit confirmation step
Structured prompts and validation replace free-form summarisation, so output shape is consistent across documents
Documented limits: OneClause is decision support for contract risk, not legal advice